Graduate Research Papers

Availability

Open Access Graduate Research Paper

Abstract

Despite the fact that the meaning of the term CPR is widely understood by the general population and that most people understand CPR to be a key to survival in the cardiac arrest victim, CPR is not being performed on the vast majority of people experiencing cardiac arrest. Statistically, approximately 350,000 cardiac arrests occur each year in the United States (AHA, 2003; Weisfeldt and Becker, 2002). Retrospective studies of witnessed cardiac arrest events indicate that no bystander CPR was performed 3 in 55% to 84% of cases (Bossaert, Van Hoeyweghen, and The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group, 1989; Cummins et al., 1985; Locke et al., 1995).

Even medical professionals are often reluctant to perform the skill. A study by Brenner and Kauffman showed that 80% of 4 registered nurses and 50% of physicians would be unwilling to perform the mouth-to-mouth component of CPR without a barrier device (1993). Because of the emergence of incurable, infectious diseases (HIV, HCV) transmitted through contact with body fluids, investigators have hypothesized that one of the reasons for this is fear of disease transmission from mouth-to-mouth breathing. This study reviews the available body of published research pertaining to ventilation in victims of cardiac arrest. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to review the historical rationale for providing ventilation during CPR, the role ventilation plays in improving the patient's physiological condition during cardiac arrest, mechanics of chest-compression-only CPR (to determine if this method could provide the same or improved benefits as standard CPR to patients in cardiac arrest), and whether ventilation could be deferred or delayed during the performance of CPR in certain situations.

Year of Submission

2004

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

School of Health, Physical Education, and Leisure Services

First Advisor

Sue Joslyn

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this graduate research paper and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit an email request to scholarworks@uni.edu. Include your name and clearly identify the thesis by full title and author as shown on the work.

Date Original

2004

Object Description

1 PDF file (81 pages)

Language

en

Share

COinS