Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

University of Northern Iowa--College of Education; Educational evaluation--Iowa--Cedar Falls; Competency-based education--Iowa--Cedar Falls; Competency-based education; Educational evaluation; Iowa--Cedar Falls;

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the beliefs and attitudes about student outcomes assessment held by faculty and administrators in the College of Education at the University of Northern Iowa. A questionnaire was distributed to all faculty and administrators in the College of Education and the results were analyzed to identify any significant differences in the data by primary responsibility, gender, tenured and untenured status, and experience. Of the 231 faculty and administrators surveyed, 151 questionnaires were returned, resulting in a 65.4% response rate. The faculty and administrators reported that the emphasis on assessment elevates the importance of teaching and learning; and increase faculty commitment to student learning. Nevertheless, faculty and administrators are concerned by the lack of institutional support as well as fear that student outcomes assessment information will be used to punish individual faculty or programs. Some significant differences which were found among the different groups, include: (a) administrators perceive fewer threats and more benefits in relation to student outcomes assessment than do faculty; and (b) those with student outcomes assessment experience are less pessimistic about the effects of student outcomes assessment than those without experience. Several implications for practice are explored by this study. Furthermore, recommendations for future research are identified.

Year of Submission

1995

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Educational Administration and Counseling

First Advisor

Florence Guido-DiBrito

Second Advisor

Michael D. Waggoner

Third Advisor

Sue Joslyn

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1995

Object Description

1 PDF file (136 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS