Home > Iowa Academy of Science > Journals & Newsletters > Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science > Volume 107 (2000) > Number 2
Document Type
Commentary
Abstract
Current attempts to introduce "scientific creationism", "creationism", or the Judeo-Christian biblical account of creation, as well as to reframe the discussion around terms such as "abrupt appearance theory", "intelligent design theory", or other disguised forms of creationism into the science classroom along with or instead of evolutionary science are strongly opposed by The Iowa Academy of Science on the grounds that creationism, in whatever form, is a religious doctrine and not science.
Publication Date
June 2000
Journal Title
Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science
Volume
107
Issue
2
First Page
54
Last Page
54
Copyright
© Copyright 2000 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc.
Language
EN
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
(2000)
"Statement of the Position of the Iowa Academy of Science on the Validity of Evolutionary Science and on the Status of Creationism as a Scientific Explanation of Natural Phenomena,"
Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science: JIAS, 107(2), 54-54.
Available at:
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/jias/vol107/iss2/8
Included in
Anthropology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons