Honors Program Theses
Award/Availability
Open Access Honors Program Thesis
First Advisor
Kyle Endres
Abstract
This study focuses on the link between knowledge of campaign finance and trust held by Americans in political institutions and members of Congress. The existing literature on the topic suggests that knowing that a congressional candidate has accepted large donations may harm political trust. A self-administered online survey was used to examine the connection between perceptions of congressional campaign funding and political trust. The survey results demonstrate a significant relationship between trust and perceptions about campaign fundraising. Specifically, the more money that the average congressional candidate was believed to have raised is associated with lower levels of trust in Congress. The survey also included an embedded survey experiment that featured a hypothetical candidate running for Congress who either accepted or rejected a contribution of significant value from a super PAC. The results show that those who were randomly assigned the candidate who rejected the contribution rated the candidate more favorably and reported higher levels of trust in the candidate to represent their interests, on average.
Year of Submission
2026
Department
Department of Political Science
University Honors Designation
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the designation University Honors
Date Original
2026
Object Description
1 PDF file (20 pages)
Copyright
©2026 Catriona Schmadeke
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
Schmadeke, Catriona, "Perceptions of Money in Politics: Analyzing the Connection Between Knowledge of Congressional Campaign Fundraising and Political Trust in the United States" (2026). Honors Program Theses. 1056.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/1056