Faculty Publications
On Estimating Market Efficiency
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Journal of Consumer Policy
Volume
15
Issue
3
First Page
275
Last Page
293
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss commentaries by Maynes and Hjorth-Andersen on our earlier paper (1990), and then go on to discuss the merits of various measures of market efficiency which have appeared in the literature. While Maynes criticized the model in our 1990 paper for a lack of realism, we argue that our limited objective of demonstrating that price-quality correlations are not necessarily related to market efficiency did not require a model which was realistic in all details. We also demonstrate that our basic conclusion that the price-quality correlation need not measure market efficiency does not depend on our theoretical model. Hjorth-Andersen advanced a number of alternative reasons why price-quality correlations may not measure efficiency, and we view his arguments largely as complementary to ours. The basic conclusion is that there are severe problems with interpreting measured price-quality correlations as measures of efficiency. We go on to discuss alternative measures. While no alternatives are completely satisfactory, we argue that measures based on deviations from an efficient frontier have some attractive properties, and are currently the most desirable alternative. © 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Department
Department of Marketing
Original Publication Date
9-1-1992
DOI of published version
10.1007/BF01017577
Recommended Citation
Ratchford, Brian T. and Gupta, Pola, "On Estimating Market Efficiency" (1992). Faculty Publications. 4477.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/4477