Faculty Publications
Comparison Of A Reading Fluency Intervention With And Without Passage Repetition On Reading Achievement
Document Type
Article
Keywords
comprehension, reading fluency
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Remedial and Special Education
Volume
33
Issue
5
First Page
309
Last Page
319
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a repeated reading and question generation intervention entitled Re-read-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) with a modified RAAC intervention without the repeated reading component. The sample included 30 students in Grades 3 through 5. The students received services in reading within a three-tiered response to intervention framework or in special education. Students were randomly assigned to the nonrepetitive condition or the control repeated reading condition and participated in 50 intervention sessions over a 4-month period. Regardless of condition, all students made gains in oral reading fluency on independent passages. The modified RAAC program without passage repetition appeared to be as effective if not more so at increasing reading fluency when compared to the RAAC program with passage repetition. © 2012 Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
Department
Department of Special Education
Original Publication Date
9-1-2012
DOI of published version
10.1177/0741932511410360
Recommended Citation
Therrien, William J.; Kirk, James F.; and Woods-Groves, Suzanne, "Comparison Of A Reading Fluency Intervention With And Without Passage Repetition On Reading Achievement" (2012). Faculty Publications. 1755.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/1755