Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Reading; Reading comprehension;

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce a preliminary explanation of why certain types of main idea instruction exist in classrooms. Semistructured interviews were the focal point of this study. Six teachers participated in the study. Two taught third grade, 2 taught fourth grade, and 2 taught fifth grade. Each teacher was interviewed twice as the basis of this study. In the first round of interviews, open-ended questions were asked of the teachers after they had read a short vignette on teaching main idea. In the second round of interviews, the teachers were asked to elaborate on previous responses and to comment on the preliminary findings of the researcher from the first round of interviews. This study produced six findings of why brief, uninformative, and product-oriented main idea instruction exists in classrooms. The first finding was students should discover answers on their own in order to remember them. Second, a student should think critically in order to transfer the finding of main idea to content area reading. Third, some teachers do not feel adequately prepared to teach main idea. Fourth, time plays a big part in teaching this skill. Fifth, a teacher relies heavily on the basal to teach main idea. Finally, main idea is a difficult task for teachers to have students grasp.

Year of Submission

1988

Degree Name

Master of Arts in Education

Department

Department of Curriculum and Instruction

First Advisor

David W. Moore

Second Advisor

Sharon Arthur Moore

Third Advisor

James L. Doud

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1988

Object Description

1 PDF file (72 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS