Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Rape--Psychological aspects--Public opinion; Men--Attitudes; Rape--Psychological aspects; Academic theses;

Abstract

This study examines conditions under which attitudes related to sexual assault, commonly known as rape myths, may be transmitted through culture by applying the tenets of Social Impact Theory (Latane, 1981). Social impact theory suggests that three forces influence attitude change, namely the immediacy of the source to the target, the strength of the source, and the number of sources of a message. It was hypothesized that participants who chatted with a confederate who was similar to them and endorsed rape myths would report accepting those beliefs at a higher rate than participants who chatted with a confederate who was similar to them but denied the validity of the beliefs. 81 male participants chatted online with a confederate who was either presented as being similar or dissimilar to them and who either endorsed rape myths or denied them. Participants then completed measures of rape myth acceptance, perceived similarity, and likability, and read and responded to 2 vignettes involving sexual assaults. Participants who chatted with a similar chat partner who endorsed rape myths did not report significantly higher levels of rape myth acceptance (RMA), but they did report higher levels of victim blame, lower levels of perpetrator blame, and lower levels of believability of a sexual assault claim. The relationship between RMA and helping behaviors was also examined. Participants who reported high levels of RMA reported lower levels of intent to help a victim of a sexual assault than those participants who reported lower levels of RMA. Implications as well as future research ideas are discussed.

Year of Submission

2009

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Psychology

First Advisor

Helen C. Harton

Second Advisor

Andrew Gilpin

Third Advisor

B. Keith Crew

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

2009

Object Description

1 PDF file (79 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS