Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Leadership--Psychological aspects; Sex differences (Psychology); Stereotypes (Social psychology);

Abstract

Men and women are believed to vary along stereotypical male and female leadership behaviors (Cann & Siegfried, 1990; Eagly & Johnson, 1990). Stereotypic leadership behaviors for men are defined as task and goal oriented behavior, whereas for women, it is interpersonal or social behavior. The present study explored the leadership behavior of male and female students in student organizations at a mid-western state university. The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI; Posner & Kouzes, 1988) was used to assess leadership behavior in the student organizations. The leaders of 100 student organizations, 50 males and 50 females, were contacted and asked to fill out a survey assessing their own leadership behaviors. Executive cabinet members of each organization, one male and one female, were also asked to fill out a survey rating the leader on the same leadership behavior. Specifically, this study addressed the question of "Do men and women lead differently in student organizations?" The results were mixed. Of the five dimensions of leadership that the LPI assessed, there was an overall gender difference between the leaders on one dimension. This dimension, Modeling the Way, measures leadership behavior pertaining to values, beliefs, and setting clear goals for the group. Women reported utilizing this dimension more than men did in their leadership practices. There was no significant interaction between the gender of the rater evaluating the leader and the gender of the leader. The student organizations were divided into four categories: academic, Greek, religious, and social. It was hypothesized that gender differences would be more salient in academic and social organizations due to the amount of structure these groups have relative to Greek and religious organizations. This hypothesis was not supported.

Year of Submission

1999

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Psychology

First Advisor

Michael Gasser

Second Advisor

Jane L. Wong

Third Advisor

Helen C. Harton

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1999

Object Description

1 PDF file (98 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS