"Identifying and Comparing Misconceptions Held by American and Russian " by Alexandra Sokolova
 

Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

University of Northern Iowa--Students; Rossiĭskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ pedagogicheskiĭ universitet imeni AI Gert︠s︡ena--Students; Rossiĭskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ pedagogicheskiĭ universitet imeni AI Gert͡sena; University of Northern Iowa; College students--Cross-cultural studies; College students; Mechanics--Study and teaching (Higher); Physics--Study and teaching (Higher); Students; Cross-cultural studies;

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of misconceptions held by undergraduate students completing an introductory physics course at the University of Northern Iowa and first-year undergraduate students taking a mechanics course at the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia. Existence of misconceptions in mechanics among Russian and American students was investigated prior to instruction and at the completion of the one-semester course. Different teaching approaches were used to introduce the students to mechanics. An activity-based approach was emphasized at UNI and a traditional lecture-lab approach was used at Herzen University. The emphasis of the study was placed on identifying misconceptions held by both groups of students, comparing misconceptions held by American and Russian students, and identifying the influence of instruction on student misconceptions. The data on student misconceptions obtained from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation assessment allowed for identification of a number of misconceptions commonly held by the Russian and American students. The study also identified how students' backgrounds influence their misconceptions. The results indicated that American and Russian students had similar misconceptions about motion and forces before instruction. This is an interesting finding given that the Russian students studied physics for several years during high school. Only half of the American students had physics during high school. The analysis of the data also showed that at the end of the semester students from both groups still had some misconceptions. Although an activity-based approach was used at UNI, only a small percentage of students changed their incorrect understanding of mechanics. One can conclude that more than one semester of physics perhaps needs to be taken at UNI to affect student misconceptions. The instruction at the Herzen University did not seem to have the desired impact of addressing student misconceptions as well. Therefore, some revisions of instruction may be needed to affect student misconceptions in mechanics.

Year of Submission

2002

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Physics

First Advisor

Roy Unruh

Second Advisor

Lawrence Escalada

Third Advisor

Cherin Lee

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

2002

Object Description

1 PDF file (90 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS