Dissertations and Theses @ UNI
Availability
Open Access Thesis
Keywords
Exercise--Physiological aspects;
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Caltrac Personal Activity Monitor against directly measured energy expenditure (EE) at treadmill speeds and grades of 3 mph, 0%; 3 mph, 8%; 5 mph, 0%; and 6 mph, 0%, with Caltracs located on the dominant hip, non-dominant hip, and the waistband at center back. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant difference between Caltrac Caloric output values (with Caltracs worn at any of the locations) and EE represented by Caloric output calculated from direct oxygen consumption (V02) and respiratory quotient (RQ) measurements from a Beckman metabolic measurement cart (MMC). It was also hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in Caltrac Caloric expenditure measures when the device was worn over a hip versus the back, and that the Caltrac would be insensitive to the vertical work component associated with walking up a grade on a motor-driven treadmill. Twenty healthy subjects (10 male, 10 female), age 21-29, were tested at the four continuous workloads for 8 minutes of data collection at each workload. VO2 was determined and EE in Calories was calculated. The results of this study indicated: 1. The Caltrac, worn at either position, does not accurately measure EE during level walking at 3 mph, graded walking at 3 mph, 8%, or level jogging at· 5 mph. 2. The Caltrac, worn at either position, does accurately measure EE during level jogging at 6 mph. 3. The Caltrac is more accurate when worn over the waistband at the center of the back while walking 3 mph on the level and when worn over the non-dominant hip when jogging at 5 mph and 6 mph on the level. 4. The Caltrac, worn at either location, over-estimates EE at 3 mph, 0%, and 5 mph, 0%, for both males and females. However, at 6 mph, 0%, the Caltrac over-estimation is not statistically significant. It was concluded that the Caltrac, at either position, is a valid measure of EE while jogging 6 mph on a level treadmill. At the remaining workloads tested, the Caltrac was not a valid measure of EE at either position.
Year of Submission
1990
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Department
School of Health, Physical Education, and Leisure Services
First Advisor
William Ryan
Second Advisor
Forrest A. Dolgener
Third Advisor
Ronald Anderson
Date Original
1990
Object Description
1 PDF file (85 leaves)
Copyright
©1990 Kimberly Lynn Jorgensen
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
Jorgensen, Kimberly Lynn, "The Validity of the Caltrac Personal Activity Computer" (1990). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 1888.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/1888
Comments
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.