Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Learning disabilities--Iowa; Learning disabled children--Education--Mathematics--Evaluation; Learning disabilities; Mathematics--Study and teaching; Iowa;

Abstract

The term learning disability denotes the inability to learn in keeping with one's potential when presented with the usual curriculum. Dyscalculia is learning disability manifested in the area of mathematics curriculum. Limited research exists in the area of dyscalculia in terms of both incidence and identification procedures. However, a fairly large number of school-aged children show deficits in this area. Despite the necessity for knowledge of mathematics, little emphasis is placed on the identification and remediation of mathematical learning disabilities. A prominent neurologist (Rosenberger, 1989) has hypothesized recently that as much as 10% of the population of school-aged children in the United States may be affected by this disorder, more even than are affected by dyslexia (Rubin, 1990). It is important, therefore, that the issue be studied further.

In the study, students with a 1.5 standard deviation difference between their normalized Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) (Hieronymus & Hoover, 1986) reading score and their normalized ITBS math score were defined as dyscalculic if the reading score was at least average and the math score was lower than the reading score or as dyslexic if the ITBS math score was at least average and the reading score was lower than the math score. With these definitions, it was found that dyscalculia did not comprise as much as 10% of the 104 students studied. Implications for laterality as a discriminant between dyslexia and dyscalculia could not be drawn and the generalizability of the clinic based results obtained by Rosenberger (1989) was questioned.

Year of Submission

1991

Degree Name

Specialist in Education

Department

Department of Educational Psychology, Foundations, and Leadership Studies

Department

Department of Educational Psychology and Foundations

First Advisor

Donald Schmits

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1991

Object Description

1 PDF file (85 pages)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS