•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Forum Theme 1

Abstract

The United States is one of the few places where a freshman-level composition course is a requirement for most students (Horner 1990). As a required course, however, it is also a source of contention, not only because of its cost to teach, but also because of its lack of perceived benefits. Complaints about the writing abilities of college students persist anecdotally among faculty, administrators and sometimes in the popular press and are often cast in terms of crises (e.g., Shiels 1975). As histories of college writing studies show, however, such perceived crises are often linked to larger, social changes about the production and regulation of meaning (Schroeder 2001), such as the expansion of higher education to new populations (Douglas 1975, Berlin 1984, Berlin 1987, Miller 1997), or technological changes that affect literacy practices (Eisenstein 1979, Miller and Shepherd 2004). However, as other researchers have noted, fears attendant to discourses of crisis often prompt calls for more rigorous standards and accountability which can paradoxically limit the opportunities for students to write well (Rose 1985).

Publication Date

Fall 2010

Journal Title

UNIversitas

Volume

6

Issue

2

First Page

1

Last Page

17

Copyright

©2010 David M. Grant

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.