•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Recent writings on the function of rhetoric range from a limiting proposal of "advocacy"1 to the challenging premise of "adapting ideas to the people and people to ideas."2 Probably one should simply accept the fact that rhetoric means many things to many people. Inherent to the belief of most theorists, however, is the assumption that without such subjects as dialectic and philosophy " ... rhetoric is blind, for it has not truth."3 Historically rhetoric has been given the servant's role of persuasion. Debate has been over what are responsible and effective means of persuasion: sophistry, truth, style, elocution, "emotional appeals," identification, good reasons, etc. While this dialogue is important and must go on, this writer questions the premise upon which it is based, that rhetoric should be primarily concerned with presenting and persuading.

Journal Title

Iowa Journal of Speech

Volume

2

Issue

1

First Page

15

Last Page

18

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.