Faculty Publications
Does "Say on Pay" Work? Evidence from Forced CEO Turnover and Compensation Committee Members Turnover
Document Type
Article
Keywords
CEO compensation, compensation committee members turnover, forced CEO turnover, institutional ownership, say on pay
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of shareholders' "Say on Pay"(SOP) votes in prompting board responsiveness. Using shareholders' SOP votes between 2011 and 2016, we find that firms with greater dissent votes are more likely to experience subsequent forced CEO turnover and compensation committee members (CCMs) turnover. We also find that the relationship between SOP dissent votes and subsequent forced CEO turnover and CCM turnover is strengthened in firms with a high level of dedicated institutional ownership, but not in firms with high transient institutional ownership. These findings reveal that dedicated institutional ownership is a channel through which the disciplinary mechanism of SOP votes becomes more visible. Overall, our study provides evidence that SOP votes serve as an effective corporate governance mechanism.
Department
Department of Accounting
Original Publication Date
9-4-2025
DOI of published version
10.1142/S0219091525500183
Recommended Citation
Kwak, Wikil; Cheng, Xiaoyan; Song, Xiao; and Wan, Huishan, "Does "Say on Pay" Work? Evidence from Forced CEO Turnover and Compensation Committee Members Turnover" (2025). Faculty Publications. 6852.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/6852