Faculty Publications

Hedging In Different Types Of Discourse

Document Type

Article

Keywords

Adaptor, Approximator, Attribution shield, Hedging, Interview, Plausibility shield, Political speech, Rounder

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Training, Language and Culture

Volume

3

Issue

2

First Page

85

Last Page

99

Abstract

The article describes discourse features of some of the most common hedges observed in modern English and explores their communicative impact on the utterance. The authors apply Prince et al.’s (1982) classification of hedges into approximators (modify the propositional content conveyed in the utterance) and shields (modify the truth value of the utterance) to analyse hedging behaviour in two discourse genres: the interview and political speeches. The paper aims to identify the most common types of hedges used in the two types of discourse, explore their structural types and pragmatic features, and account for their usage in the two types of discourse. The study is conducted within the framework of contemporary linguistics, such as functional grammar, pragmatics and comparative analysis. The authors make inferences about the nature of hedging, key features of hedges and their discourse-marked specifics.

Department

Department of Languages and Literatures

Original Publication Date

1-1-2019

DOI of published version

10.29366/2019tlc.3.2.6

Repository

UNI ScholarWorks, Rod Library, University of Northern Iowa

Language

en

Link to Full Text

Comments?

Share

COinS