"Trunk Exercise Training Improves Muscle Size, Strength, And Function I" by Behnaz Shahtahmassebi, Jeffrey J. Hebert et al.
 

Faculty Publications

Trunk Exercise Training Improves Muscle Size, Strength, And Function In Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Document Type

Article

Keywords

ageing, aging, core, detraining, exercise therapy, walking

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Volume

29

Issue

7

First Page

980

Last Page

991

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multimodal exercise program to increase trunk muscle morphology and strength in older individuals, and their associated changes in functional ability. Using a single-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial design, 64 older adults (≥60 years) were randomly allocated to a 12-week exercise program comprising walking and balance exercises with or without trunk strengthening/motor control exercises; followed by a 6-week walking-only program (detraining; 32 per group). Trunk muscle morphology (ultrasound imaging), strength (isokinetic dynamometer), and functional ability and balance (6-Minute Walk Test; 30 second Chair Stand Test; Sitting and Rising Test; Berg Balance Scale, Multi-Directional Reach Test; Timed Up and Go; Four Step Square Test) were the primary outcome measures. Sixty-four older adults (mean [SD]; age: 69.8 [7.5] years; 59.4% female) were randomized into two exercise groups. Trunk training relative to walking-balance training increased (mean difference [95% CI]) the size of the rectus abdominis (2.08 [1.29, 2.89] cm2), lumbar multifidus (L4/L5:0.39 [0.16, 0.61] cm; L5/S1:0.31 [0.07, 0.55] cm), and the lateral abdominal musculature (0.63 [0.40, 0.85] cm); and increased trunk flexion (29.8 [4.40, 55.31] N), extension (37.71 [15.17, 60.25] N), and lateral flexion (52.30 [36.57, 68.02] N) strength. Trunk training relative to walking-balance training improved 30-second Chair Stand Test (5.90 [3.39, 8.42] repetitions), Sitting and Rising Test (1.23 [0.24, 2.23] points), Forward Reach Test (4.20 [1.89, 6.51] cm), Backward Reach Test (2.42 [0.33, 4.52] cm), and Timed Up and Go Test (−0.76 [−1.40, −0.13] seconds). Detraining led to some declines but all outcomes remained significantly improved when compared to pre-training. These findings support the inclusion of trunk strengthening/motor control exercises as part of a multimodal exercise program for older adults.

Department

School of Health, Physical Education, and Leisure Services

Original Publication Date

7-1-2019

DOI of published version

10.1111/sms.13415

Repository

UNI ScholarWorks, Rod Library, University of Northern Iowa

Language

en

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 22
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 6
  • Captures
    • Readers: 186
see details

Share

COinS