Faculty Publications
Correspondence: An Application Of Interpretive Structural Modeling To A University Research Committee's Grant Decisions
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Systems Research
Volume
5
Issue
2
First Page
157
Last Page
160
Abstract
Universities maintain many systems that help order activities. Among these are the systems that provide financial support for research activity. One frequently occurring system is a university level committee that reviews the merits of research funding requests. In this study. Interpretive Structural Modeling is used to generate the hierarchy of criteria employed by a university research committee to evaluate and fund proposals from faculty in the arts, music, mathematics, science, and the applied disciplines. Thirty‐four elements and 20 levels are developed. The resulting hierarchy is a preference list suitable for judging proposals that lend themselves to formal research design. The existing system using the current project evaluation framework to simultaneously encourage creative work in art and music along with traditional research in other disciplines is deemed unsatisfactory. A separate allocation system for the arts and music is under study. Copyright © 1988 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Department
Department of Management
Department
Department of English Language and Literature
Original Publication Date
1-1-1988
DOI of published version
10.1002/sres.3850050209
Recommended Citation
Rappaport, Allen; Scott Cawelti, G.; and Ratliff, Ruth E., "Correspondence: An Application Of Interpretive Structural Modeling To A University Research Committee's Grant Decisions" (1988). Faculty Publications. 4669.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/4669