Faculty Publications
Evaluational Internalism, Epistemic Virtues, And The Significance Of Trying
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Journal of Philosophical Research
Volume
31
First Page
1
Last Page
20
Abstract
While there is general agreement about the list of epistemic virtues, there has been much controversy over what it is to be an epistemic virtue. Three competing theories have been offered: evaluational externalism, evaluational internalism, and mixed theories. A major problem with internalism, the focus of this paper, is that it disconnects the value of epistemic virtue from actual success in the real world (the Disconnection Problem). Relying on a novel thesis about the relation of "trying" and "exercise of virtue," James Montmarquet (1993; 2000) has offered, to my knowledge, the only solution to this problem. In this paper, I evaluate this solution by deriving from it an important implication and arguing that, if examined in the light of the recent work on self-control in philosophy and psychology, this implication proves problematic. I conclude by drawing a general lesson about the prospects of internalism and suggesting that in the absence of a satisfactory solution to the disconnection problem, externalism and mixed theories become more attractive.
Department
Department of Philosophy and Religion
Original Publication Date
1-1-2006
DOI of published version
10.5840/jpr_2006_16
Recommended Citation
Lahroodi, Reza, "Evaluational Internalism, Epistemic Virtues, And The Significance Of Trying" (2006). Faculty Publications. 2842.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/2842