Faculty Publications
Clashing Epistemologies: Aspiring Teachers', Practicing Teachers', And Professors' Beliefs About Knowledge And Research In Education
Document Type
Article
Keywords
Educational research, Epistemologies, Preservice teachers' beliefs, Teachers' beliefs
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Teaching and Teacher Education
Volume
23
Issue
2
First Page
123
Last Page
135
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in preservice teachers', practicing teachers', and teacher education professors' beliefs about educational research; specifically, what counts as legitimate knowledge in education and how that knowledge may be obtained. Participants' responses to two vignettes and dilemmas indicate that many preservice teachers believe that educational knowledge is highly particularistic, and that it cannot be falsified. In contrast, most professors articulated the belief that educational knowledge can be generalized and also falsified. Practicing teachers fell in the middle of this continuum. Implications of these different beliefs and assumptions for teacher education are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Department
Department of Educational Psychology and Foundations
Original Publication Date
4-1-2007
DOI of published version
10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.032
Recommended Citation
Joram, Elana, "Clashing Epistemologies: Aspiring Teachers', Practicing Teachers', And Professors' Beliefs About Knowledge And Research In Education" (2007). Faculty Publications. 2631.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/2631