Faculty Publications
Document Type
Letter
Publication Version
Published Version
Journal/Book/Conference Title
Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness
Volume
19
Issue
1
First Page
49
Last Page
50
Abstract
We appreciate the interest that our study elicited and the comments from a reader. We commend the reader of our paper for critically evaluating the protocol and results of the study. Here, we would like to respond to the statement made in the letter. Indeed, the rest intervals were longer and time at VO2max was lower in our study than recommended by Bucheit and Larsen.1 However, because the reader is interested in the practical implications of our study, we ask that they consider the following:
Department
Department of Kinesiology
Original Publication Date
1-1-2021
Object Description
1 PDF file
DOI of published version
10.1016/j.jesf.2020.10.001
Repository
UNI ScholarWorks, Rod Library, University of Northern Iowa
Copyright
©2021 Tony P. Nuñez, Fabiano T. Amorim, Nicholas M. Beltz, Christine M. Mermier, Terence A. Moriarty, Roberto C. Nava, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, and Len Kravitz
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
Nuñez, Tony P.; Amorim, Fabiano T.; Beltz, Nicholas M.; Mermier, Christine M.; Moriarty, Terence A.; Nava, Roberto C.; VanDusseldorp, Trisha A.; and Kravitz, Len, "Reply To “Programming May Matter Most.” Response To “Metabolic Effects Of Two High-Intensity Circuit Training Protocols: Does Sequence Matter?”" (2021). Faculty Publications. 211.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/211
Comments
First published in Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, v.19 (2021) pp. 49-50. DOI:10.1016/j.jesf.2020.10.001