•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Oral Presentation

Abstract

Because a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) of approximately .7 is associated with higher rates of fertility, evolutionary psychologists have suggested that women with this WHR are generally rated as more attractive. Puhl and Boland (2001) challenged this idea as their study found that photographs of a model with a .86 WHR were rated as more attractive than the curvier figure of the model with a .7 WHR. Because WHR studies have traditionally used line drawings as stimuli, the use of actual photographs is novel and subject to question. This study examined the stimuli used by Puhl and Boland for the extent to which the photographs portray the true shape differential of the models. Results of measuring the photographs to calculate the depicted WHR are not significant (t (55) = 1.29, p. > .2), suggesting that the photographic stimuli do not accurately convey the WHR of the live models.

Publication Date

2003

Journal Title

Conference Proceedings: Undergraduate Social Science Research Conference

Volume

7

Issue

1

First Page

45

Last Page

48

Copyright

©2003 by the University of Northern Iowa

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Publisher

University of Northern Iowa

City

Cedar Falls, IA

Share

COinS