Biology Faculty Publications

Document Type

Article

Keywords

Barley, Awn, Leaf, Lemma, Palea, Drought, Water status, Gas exchange, Metabolites

Journal/Book/Conference Title Title

BMC Plant Biology

Volume

16

Issue

248

Abstract

Background: Photosynthetic organs of the cereal spike (ear) provide assimilate for grain filling, but their response to drought is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the drought response of individual organs of the barley spike (awn, lemma, and palea) and compared them with a vegetative organ (fifth leaf). Understanding differences in physiological and metabolic responses between the leaf and spike organs during drought can help us develop high yielding cultivars for environments where terminal drought is prevalent.

Results: We exposed barley plants to drought by withholding water for 4 days at the grain filling stage and compared changes in: (1) relative water content (RWC), (2) osmotic potential (Ψs), (3) osmotic adjustment (OA), (4) gas exchange, and (5) metabolite content between organs. Drought reduced RWC and Ψs in all four organs, but the decrease in RWC was greater and there was a smaller change in Ψs in the fifth leaf than the spike organs. We detected evidence of OA in the awn, lemma, and palea, but not in the fifth leaf. Rates of gas exchange declined more rapidly in the fifth leaf than awn during drought. We identified 18 metabolites but, only ten metabolites accumulated significantly during drought in one or more organs. Among these, proline accumulated in all organs during drought while accumulation of the other metabolites varied between organs. This may suggest that each organ in the same plant uses a different set of osmolytes for drought resistance.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that photosynthetic organs of the barley spike maintain higher water content, greater osmotic adjustment, and higher rates of gas exchange than the leaf during drought. Keywords: Barley, Awn, Leaf, Lemma, Palea, Drought, Water status, Gas exchange, Metabolites

Department

Department of Biology

Department

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Comments

First published in BMC Plant Biology, v. 16 n.248 (2016), 12 pages, published by BioMed Central Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0922-1

Original Publication Date

2016

DOI of published version

10.1186/s12870-016-0922-1

Repository

UNI ScholarWorks, University of Northern Iowa, Rod Library

Date Digital

2016

Copyright

©2016 Mark E. Sherrard, Kirk P. Manfredi, and Tilahun Abebe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Language

EN

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Biology Commons

Share

COinS