Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Acquaintance rape; Rape;

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine if gender differences exist in assigning blame following a sexual assault. Based on the review of the literature it was hypothesized that women would be more predisposed than men to self-blame following a sexual assault. It was also hypothesized that, overall , those who possessed low rape myth acceptance would be less likely to see the victim as blame worthy and more likely to see the perpetrator as to blame for the sexual assault. Those with high rape myth acceptance would be more likely to see the victim as blame worthy and less likely to see the perpetrator as to blame for the sexual assault. The subjects were 395 undergraduate college students (231 females; 164 males) enrolled in Introductory Psychology courses at the University of Northern Iowa. Each subject read an acquaintance rape scenario designed by L'Armand and Pepitone (1982) and modified by the present researcher. Following the scenario each subject filled out a questionnaire regarding the scenario developed by Bulman and Wortman (1977) and modified by the present researcher. Finally each subject completed a Rape Myth Acceptance questionnaire designed by Burt (1980). The results of the study did not support the hypothesis that women were more likely to self-blame following a sexual assault. The results did support the hypothesis that those with low rape myth acceptance were less likely to see the victim as blame worthy and more likely to see the perpetrator as blame worthy. If the person had high rape myth acceptance they were more likely to assign more blame to the victim and assigned less blame to the perpetrator.

Year of Submission

1992

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Psychology

First Advisor

Beverly Kopper

Second Advisor

Jane Wong

Third Advisor

Augustine Osman

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to [email protected] and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1992

Object Description

1 PDF file (60 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS