Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD: From "what works" to what matters
Learning disabilities, Research methods, SBR, Scientifically based research
Learning Disability Quarterly
The field of learning disabilities (LD) has a complex and complicated history. Tensions over definitions, eligibility criteria, service delivery models, and best practices, as well as epistemological debates, have been a part of that history from its inception. Given our collective struggles, as well as the current realities facing the field, there could not be a more critical moment for a conversation about how it is that we go about knowing what we know. In this concluding essay, we consider how, by focusing so intently on what works, we, as a field, may inadvertently lose sight of what matters. In other words, contrary to the push for narrowing what counts as evidence or knowledge, we examine the potential value in opening up the field to a more diverse range of methods for students who struggle academically. We also challenge taken-for-granted assumptions in the push toward evidence- or research-based practice. Finally, we highlight several compelling themes that we take away from the contributors of this special double issue. © Council on Learning Disabilities 2011.
Department of Special Education
Original Publication Date
DOI of published version
Ferri, Beth A.; Gallagher, Deborah; and Connor, David J., "Pluralizing methodologies in the field of LD: From "what works" to what matters" (2011). Faculty Publications. 1910.