Faculty Publications

Title

Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function item bank, version 1.0: Physical function assessment for athletic patient populations

Document Type

Article

Keywords

Athletic injuries, Clinical decision making, PROMIS

Journal/Book/Conference Title

Journal of Athletic Training

Volume

51

Issue

9

First Page

727

Last Page

732

Abstract

Context: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) item banks have been validated for general populations, but their application to high-functioning patient populations remains speculative. Objective: To examine the measurement properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank, version 1.0, when applied to individuals representing high levels of physical ability. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I and III collegiate athletic training rooms and intramural events. Patients or Other Participants: A heterogeneous sample of 215 adults from Division I or Division III collegiate or recreational sports volunteered for this study. Participants were divided into 4 groups depending on sport activity and injury status: healthy collegiate (HC; 33 men, 37 women; age=19.7 ± 1.1 years), injured and currently active in sport (IP; 21 men, 29 women; age=19.9 ± 1.2 years), injured and currently not active in sport (INP; 12 men, 18 women; age = 19.7 ± 1.3 years), and healthy recreational (HR; 47 men, 18 women; age = 20.1 ± 1.4 years). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants completed 2 assessments: (1) an injury- history questionnaire and (2) the PROMIS physical function item bank, version 1.0, in computeradaptive form. Mean PROMIS physical function scores were determined for each group. Results: The PROMIS physical function score for the HC group (61.7 ± 6.0) was higher than for the IP (54.9 ± 7.5) and INP (44.1 ± 8.2) groups (P < .001). The IP group had a higher score than the INP group (P < .001). Mean PROMIS scores were not different between the HC and HR participants (mean difference = 1.9, P = .10). Conclusions: The computer-adaptive PROMIS physical function item bank, version 1.0, accurately distinguished injury status in elite-level athletes on a physical function latent trait continuum. Although it was unable to distinguish HC athletes from HR athletes, exposing a possible ceiling effect, it offers potential for use as an outcome instrument for athletic trainers and other sports medicine clinicians.

Original Publication Date

9-1-2016

DOI of published version

10.4085/1062-6050-51.11.06

Repository

UNI ScholarWorks, Rod Library, University of Northern Iowa

Language

en

Share

COinS