Trigram learning, forward training, backward training, conventional training
Ss were instructed to learn a list of 10 CVC trigrams by either the conventional serial anticipation method, backward conditioning or forward conditioning. The F ratio failed to show a significant difference between the three experimental groups. The results contradict previous results which shown that forward training is more efficient than the other two methods.
Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science
© Copyright 1971 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc.
Embree, Robert A.; Senn, Murray; and Doering, Glenna
"Comparison of Forward, Backward, and Conventional Training in the Learning of a List of CVC Trigrams,"
Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 78(1-2), 16-17.
Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol78/iss1/7