•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Research

Abstract

Hullian psychology conceptualizes the effects of noxious stimulation as drive producing and the effects of removal of such stimulation as a rewarding state of affairs (3). These effects have been repeatedly demonstrated in situations where they have facilitated learning (2, 4). It is obvious, however, that increased drive need not necessarily aid learning, and it may at times hinder it. The present study is concerned with the consequences for learning when electric shock is introduced at the same time as the stimulus word and is removed when the response word is spoken in paired-associate learning. The study is particularly interested in investigating some of the phenomena recently reported by Alper (1). Alper has found that while rate of verbal learning is not faster in more motivated subjects, the retention after a twenty-four hour period is greater than for less motivated subjects. (She increased motivation by means of verbal instruction. Subjects were told the task was related to intelligence; this, she claims, constituted an "ego threat.'') The effect of increased drive on both learning rate and amount of retention is considered by the research about to be reported.

Publication Date

1950

Journal Title

Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science

Volume

57

Issue

1

First Page

429

Last Page

433

Copyright

© Copyright 1950 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc.

Language

EN

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.