•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This analysis examines gendered scripts used by U.S. Senate candidates Joni Ernst and Alison Lundergan Grimes in their political ads during the 2014 midterm election. Adapting Gibson and Heyse's (2010) approach to examining gendered scripts, this article found that both Ernst and Grimes relied on masculine scripts that undermined the feminine appeals they used and reinforced hegemonic ideology. While employing a similar mix of gendered scripts that included emasculating their opponents, the candidates differed in their electoral success. Ernst's political ads remained ideologically consistent with the Republican Party's ideals and she won her race by nine points. In contrast, Grimes's ads featured ideologically inconsistent positions with the Democratic Party's ideals and she lost by more than 15 points. Additionally, the article demonstrates that the context of the 2014 midterm election represented a repudiation of President Barack Obama, which further promoted masculine scripts to cater to conservative audiences. 'Implications are drawn concerning politicians' use of a faux feminine performance that supports hegemonic ideology at the denigration of feminine ideals.

Journal Title

Iowa Journal of Communication

Volume

50

Issue

2

First Page

95

Last Page

119

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.