Abstract
The project of this paper moves beyond the classic view of free speech in recognizing that there is still a wrong suffered by the victims of hate-speech and in suggesting the right of reply as a remedy for this injustice. I do not think that this solution is adequate, however, not simply because another solution would be better, but because the problem, the systematic character of the injustice suffered (what Jean Francois Lyotard has termed "le differend") has not adequately been accounted for and addressed.
Journal Title
Iowa Journal of Speech Communication
Volume
23
Issue
2
First Page
51
Last Page
53
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
Shapiro, Susan
(1991)
"Response to "The Case for a Right to Reply," by Susan Shapiro,"
Iowa Journal of Communication: Vol. 23:
No.
2, Article 9.
Available at:
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/ijc/vol23/iss2/9
Copyright
©1991 Iowa Communication Association
