•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to look critically at an instructional practice which is inconsistent with democratic ideals: that practice is restricting students' topics based on the teacher's preferences or on the assumed norms of the community, school, or class. The democratic ideal with which this practice is in conflict is expressed in the First Amendment of the Constitution which states that freedom of speech cannot be abridged by law. Inasmuch as telling a class what they may not speak about is not a law, the teacher is not violating the First Amendment. However, the ideal articulated in that amendment is the basis for the belief that Americans have the right to speak out on any issue, that issues should be freely discussed by all sides, and that open discussion of issues is the fairest way to arrive at solutions to problems.

Journal Title

Iowa Journal of Speech Communication

Volume

13

Issue

1

First Page

30

Last Page

32

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.