
Faculty Publications
Why Do Effective Science Teachers Persist?: Exploring Post-induction Effective Science Teachers’ Experiences through a Collective Case Study
Document Type
Article
Keywords
Collective case study, Effective science teaching, Teacher attrition, Teacher persistence
Journal/Book/Conference Title
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Abstract
This collective case study aimed to identify post-induction effective science teachers in the United States and explore why they persist. We used the Local Systemic Change Classroom Observation Protocol (LSC-COP) to determine science teaching effectiveness and identify appropriate participants. The median and mode of the LSC-COP capsule score were 4.5 and 5, respectively, on a five-point scale, indicating that participants’ instruction was likely to enhance students’ understanding of science and their capacity to do science. Interviews with participants about their experiences yielded seven themes that pertain to effective science teachers’ persistence: exemplary preservice programs, meaningful support, autonomy, student goals, engaging in deliberate practice, building relationships with students, and viewing teaching as a moral act. Our study found that for teachers to persist, they have to view teaching as more than a job and have the support and the freedom to engage in deliberate practice in order to continually improve their teaching for their students.
Department
Department of Biology
Department
Department of Science Education
Original Publication Date
12-11-2024
DOI of published version
10.1007/s10763-024-10525-8
Recommended Citation
Wilcox, Jesse; Ramker, Molly Ella; Lange, William Raymond; Kota, Pranav; Kress, Carolyn; Fettkether, Lily; Clausen, Dori; and Willis, Kiran, "Why Do Effective Science Teachers Persist?: Exploring Post-induction Effective Science Teachers’ Experiences through a Collective Case Study" (2024). Faculty Publications. 6746.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facpub/6746