Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Award Winner

Recipient of the 1992 Outstanding Master's Thesis Award - Second Place.

To go to the Graduate Student Award Recipients collection page, click here.

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Abstract

Technology, as a form of knowledge, can be an important explanatory variable in empirical sociological investigations. In this thesis the macrohistorical concept of technology within the discipline of sociology is traced and critiqued, with special attention given to analytical misconceptions and reifications, e.g., confusing technology with its processes, products, and social consequences. An analytical model is initially presented which attempts to facilitate a better understanding of the dialectical interrelationships between technological, social, and natural (scientific) phenomena. Recent attempts to measure the effects of technology on social relationships are critiqued, particularly in their inadequate conceptualization and operationalization, confusion of cause and effect, lack of generalizability, and failure to empirically address technology's explanatory power. It is hypothesized that by knowing whether a person reifies technology (i.e., views it as an external autonomous force instead of a humanly constructed and maintained body of knowledge) one can more accurately predict whether a person finds technology uncontrollable or problematic throughout various dimensions of his or her social and psychological experience. Finally, a proposal for research is presented which could be used to empirically test this hypothesis based on statistical analyses of data obtained from a national random-sample mail survey.

Year of Submission

1991

Year of Award

1992 Award

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminology

First Advisor

Jerry Stockdale, Chair, Thesis Committee

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit an email request to scholarworks@uni.edu. Include your name and clearly identify the thesis by full title and author as shown on the work.

Date Original

5-1991

Object Description

1 PDF file (vii, 129 pages)

Language

EN

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS