Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Aggressiveness; Interpersonal relations; Self-perception;

Abstract

Interpersonal aggression is analyzed with the use of the symbolic interactionist perspective in this thesis. The literature generally lacks such an analysis. Symbolic interactionism views individuals as active definers and constructors of a reality. Individuals gain a sense of reality and the means by which to define it through the process of being socialized into various groups. That part of reality which is most important to the individual is termed "significant reality." A major part of an individual's "significant reality" is his or her self-concept. When an individual deems his or her "significant reality" is threatened, he or she may engage in a number of activities in an attempt to reduce the threat. Some of these activities may be defined by the individual and/or others as aggressive. These behaviors, as well as the reaction of others to them, in turn influence a person's self-concept. Interpersonal aggression occurs predominately among people who interact fairly frequently, extensively, and intensively. This provides many chances for actual or perceived threats to occur to one's "significant reality." It also provides many areas in which one may feel or actually be threatened. A selected documentation of incidents that have heightened people's awareness of conflict, aggression, and violence is included. This thesis also contains a discussion of why the study of conflictual phenomena is so complex and difficult. It is maintained the complexity and difficulty derive from the phenomena not being as simple as some characterize it as being but also the complexity and difficulty arise from the use and abuse of certain assumptions, concepts, definitions, and examples.

Year of Submission

1981

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work

First Advisor

Robert Claus

Second Advisor

Ronald Roberts

Third Advisor

Virgil Noack

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

1981

Object Description

1 PDF file (223 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Sociology Commons

Share

COinS