Dissertations and Theses @ UNI

Availability

Open Access Thesis

Keywords

Influence (Psychology); Leadership--Psychological aspects; Performance--Psychological aspects;

Abstract

This study examined the effects on performance and attitudes of three different types of influence tactics including exchange, personal appeal and inspirational appeal. The sample consisted of 78 undergraduate students from the University of Northern Iowa. The researcher conducting the study gave instructions for a paper-folding task to construct miniature paper tents. The instructions were given in a manner demonstrating one of the three influence tactics. After hearing the instructions, the participants' attitudes toward the researcher were evaluated using the Supervisory Behavior Description (as cited in Robinson, Athanasiou, & Head, 1974). The participants were then given materials to construct as many paper tent figures as they could in a limited amount of time. The tents were later counted and evaluated by the researcher. Performance was based on a quantity arid quality measure. Attitude was based on the participant's total score on the Supervisory Behavior Description (as cited in Robinson et al., 197 4 ). The results showed that there was a significant difference in performance. As expected, subjects who were exposed to the inspirational appeal tactic made better quality paper tents than subjects exposed to the exchange tactic. No effect was found for the personal appeal tactic. Although the results showed that there was a significant difference in attitudes, the type of difference found was contrary to what was expected. Subjects who were exposed to the inspirational appeal tactic had lower supervisory evaluations than subjects exposed to the personal appeal tactic. No effect was found for the exchange tactic.

Year of Submission

2000

Degree Name

Master of Arts

Department

Department of Psychology

First Advisor

David Whitsett

Second Advisor

Michael Gasser

Third Advisor

Adam Butler

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to scholarworks@uni.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.

Date Original

2000

Object Description

1 PDF file (69 leaves)

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS